Could not VS was not able to?

1 Answer. We use could for general ability. However, when you want to say that somebody did something in a specific situation, use was/ were be able to or managed to (not could).

Is I didn’t used to correct?

“Didn’t use to” is correct. In simple past tense did is used as an auxiliary verb. The form of an interrogative sentence is “ Did +subject(+not)+verb1(present tense form of the verb)+ object” or “Didn’t +subject+…

Which is correct not to be or to not be?

Answer: Both are grammatically correct. For example: “To be or not to be” could just as well have been “To be or to not be.” “NOT TO”.

Could was able to difference?

1)According to ‘A Practical English Grammar’ by AJ Thomson et al, the one difference between could and be able to in the past affirmative is that could just implies that you had the general freedom or permission to do something, but may not have actually done or achieved it, where as be able to implies that you …

When can we use could in a sentence?

“Could” is a modal verb used to express possibility or past ability as well as to make suggestions and requests. “Could” is also commonly used in conditional sentences as the conditional form of “can.” Examples: Extreme rain could cause the river to flood the city.

Is not I grammatically correct?

“Me” is the accusative (objective) and prepositional form of I. Therefore, if you’re talking about something you didn’t do, “Not I” is strictly correct, whereas if you’re talking about something that wasn’t done to you, “Not me” is strictly correct. However colloquially “Not me” is acceptable in any context.

Which is more correct grammatically?

‘More correct’ is grammatically perfectly fine, whether it makes any sense or not; grammar does not describe the logical, semantic content of what you say, only the structure of how you say it.

Can I or could I?

Which of these is correct? “Can I” is best for semi-formal situations. “Could I” is best for semi-formal situations. “May I” is best for semi-formal situations.